home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=93TT0541>
- <title>
- Nov. 15, 1993: The Political Interest
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1993
- Nov. 15, 1993 A Christian In Winter:Billy Graham
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- THE POLITICAL INTEREST, Page 51
- Back To The War Room
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>MICHAEL KRAMER
- </p>
- <p> Late on Election Day last week, the message magicians who had
- brilliantly guided Bill Clinton's 1992 presidential campaign
- could hardly contain themselves. James Carville and Paul Begala
- predicted a "twofer": Governor Jim Florio, their horse in New
- Jersey, would coast to re-election, and politicians everywhere
- would learn the Big Lesson. "Florio shows you can do the hard
- things that have to be done [like raising taxes] and defeat
- an opponent who offers feel-good stuff [like tax cuts]," Carville
- crowed.
- </p>
- <p> Reality hit within hours. The race that would make the case
- for activist government was lost. Carville and Begala were almost
- too depressed to put their spin on things. "I couldn't look
- Florio in the eye last night," Carville began. "But," he added,
- pitching forward cheerfully, "today's the first time in a while
- that I read the business section before the front page." Sure
- enough, the "real stuff," as Carville called it, was encouraging:
- housing starts, manufacturing, productivity and construction
- spending were all up. Perhaps the man who had won the White
- House by promising to focus his laser on the economy would be
- safe in 1996 after all. "Not to worry," Carville boomed cheerfully,
- seeming to speak mostly to himself.
- </p>
- <p> Begala, the more sober of the duo--which isn't saying much,
- since it's hard to imagine anyone more crazed than Carville--saw lots to worry about. In fact, in the battle about whether
- the '93 results mean everything (the Republican view) or nothing
- (the President's), Begala is a virtual heretic. "What these
- Republican victories mean is that the folks in Congress, who
- are risk averse to start with, are now going to be more skittish
- than ever," Begala said. "And that includes most Democrats.
- The fear of change is being fed, big time."
- </p>
- <p> Nonetheless, Begala urges pressing ahead. "The President has
- raised expectations pretty high," he concedes. "He has to deliver
- now, and it's in the Democratic Congress's interest to help
- him." Why? "Because people want change even though it scares
- them. We should pass all kinds of stuff and then go to the voters
- and say, `Hey, some of it may not work, but we're finally doing
- things. We've got this baby humming now, and that's what's important.'"
- </p>
- <p> Begala's argument makes a virtue of necessity: retreating to
- passivity would doom Clinton for sure. But the polls describe
- a suspicious electorate that views the President's call for
- "more efficient" government as a cover for bigger government
- and more spending, which the voters very definitely do not want.
- </p>
- <p> The greatest trouble for Clinton is a robust Republican Party,
- especially an ideologically cohesive, naysaying congressional
- delegation capable of staying the President's innate activism.
- "History says we'll gain about three Senate and 20 House seats
- in '94," says former G.O.P. national chairman Rich Bond. "Now
- I think we'll do even better. The big break for us in the latest
- results is going to come in candidate recruitment. These days,
- too few good people want to expose themselves to the scrutiny
- that comes when you run for office. That's magnified when running
- looks like suicide; no one wants to lose and be cut up at the
- same time. Clinton's perceived weakness and these victories
- can overcome that hesitation. Better people will take a chance
- and better candidates mean more wins."
- </p>
- <p> To which Paul Begala merely sighs in agreement. "I'm beginning
- to feel like General Custer in that old joke--where he looks
- up kind of startled and says, `Where the hell did all these
- Indians come from?' Only our Indians are Republicans--and
- now they'll be even less inclined to listen when we urge them
- to put country before party." Which means that from here on,
- it's all-out war.
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-